Waterfowl in North America consist of ducks, geese and swans (Anitidae) that inhabit various fresh and salt water habitats across the continent. These are generally identified as “dabbling ducks,” “diving ducks,” “whistling ducks,” geese and swans.
Dabbling ducks are labeled for the way in which they feed by an inverted position on water plants in shallow waters. Dabbling ducks also feed on plant matter and certain insects out of water.
Diving ducks are those species that feed by diving deeper to feed on vegetation, certain insects and certain fish in larger bodies of water.
Geese consist of three distinct groups: grey, white and black.
Swans in North America consist of trumpeter, tundra and the non-native mute introduced from Europe.
Waterfowl hunting programs are primarily regulated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under the authority of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918). Waterfowl hunting programs are run in conjunction with the state waterfowl hunting programs working in concert with four Flyway Councils: the Atlantic, the Mississippi, the Central and the Pacific Flyway Councils. Ultimate authority on methods of take of waterfowl rests with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Under the influence of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and environmental groups, Flyway Councils started implementing lead shot restrictions and permitted methods of take regulations in the mid-1970s. States were not required to implement lead shot restrictions for waterfowl hunting absent federal funding in 1978 (the Stevens Amendment). Waterfowl lead shot bans were ultimately phased in across the United States by 1991, after a combination of litigation by the National Wildlife Federation and the lapse of the Steven’s Amendment in 1986.
Early use of replacement “nontoxic shot,” such as steel, has been noted for a higher crippling potential, which also had an early and negative effect on waterfowl populations. Modern versions of steel shot are still well known for crippling waterfowl.
Hunt for Truth is researching the potential toxicity in various waterfowl.
Ammunition prices are already on the rise and imposing a ban on traditional ammunition and fishing tackle would result in considerable reductions in the number of sportsmen participating in the outdoors, and funding the future of our fish and wildlife habitat.
— Rep. Jeff Miller (R-Fla.)
I think the good news I’ve heard across the Commission . . . is that there is unanimity that everybody wants to have all of the data to make the right decisions.
— California Fish and Game Commissioner Daniel M. Richards
There's no sound science that show lead ammunition having an impact on wildlife population
— Lawrence Keane of the National Shooting Sports Foundation,
Fox News